<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kink On Tap 17: Sexual Adultism and an Interview with Nikolas Coukouma</title>
	<atom:link href="http://KinkOnTap.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=189" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://KinkOnTap.com/?p=189&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=kink-on-tap-17-sexual-adultism-and-an-interview-with-nikolas-coukouma</link>
	<description>The smart sexuality netcast for the kinkily inclined.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 17:04:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: maymay</title>
		<link>http://KinkOnTap.com/?p=189&#038;cpage=1#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>maymay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KinkOnTap.com/?p=189#comment-44</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s also evidence that suggests &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neurodiversity&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;different people&#039;s brains are different&lt;/a&gt;. Should we use that evidence to discount the judgement of some adults over the judgement of others? Perhaps we should just use the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=his-brain-her-brain&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;biological differences between male and female brains&lt;/a&gt; to discount the judgment of one gender, but not another?

I find such biological arguments are an extremely slippery, and arrogant, slope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s also evidence that suggests <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neurodiversity" rel="nofollow">different people&#8217;s brains are different</a>. Should we use that evidence to discount the judgement of some adults over the judgement of others? Perhaps we should just use the <a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=his-brain-her-brain" rel="nofollow">biological differences between male and female brains</a> to discount the judgment of one gender, but not another?</p>
<p>I find such biological arguments are an extremely slippery, and arrogant, slope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://KinkOnTap.com/?p=189&#038;cpage=1#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KinkOnTap.com/?p=189#comment-43</guid>
		<description>&quot;The adolescent brain is fundamentally different from the adult one. Although scientists don&#039;t understand all the implications of these differences, they say the distinctions could explain why an adult would have the self-control to resist the impulse to kill someone, and a teenager would not.&quot;
From: http://www.boston.com/news/globe/health_science/articles/2004/10/12/brain_science_v_death_penalty/

Thoughts?  Doesn&#039;t this evidence suggest that discounting young adults&#039; judgment is scientifically accurate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The adolescent brain is fundamentally different from the adult one. Although scientists don&#8217;t understand all the implications of these differences, they say the distinctions could explain why an adult would have the self-control to resist the impulse to kill someone, and a teenager would not.&#8221;<br />
From: <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/globe/health_science/articles/2004/10/12/brain_science_v_death_penalty/" rel="nofollow">http://www.boston.com/news/globe/health_science/articles/2004/10/12/brain_science_v_death_penalty/</a></p>
<p>Thoughts?  Doesn&#8217;t this evidence suggest that discounting young adults&#8217; judgment is scientifically accurate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
